From a great NJ Star-Ledger editorial:
The "pay to delay" deals are an anti-consumer twist on a law that was meant to help the public. The law was supposed to encourage generics to negotiate settlements that would bring them to market sooner, but the result has been a delayed market entry. Typically, the price of the first generic on the market is 20 percent lower than the brand-name price, and generic competition can reduce prices as much as 80 percent.
Increasingly, however, the industry's idea of a settlement is to pay off the generics to kill the challenges. The Federal Trade Commission says Schering-Plough of Kenilworth paid $90 million to two generic companies positioned to market a cheaper version of a Schering blood pressure drug. Bristol Myers Squibb agreed to pay $40 million to a Canadian generic to delay a knockoff of the blockbuster blood thinner Plavix, a deal that eventually fell through and led to regime change at Bristol Myers Squibb.
With many of the biggest-selling drugs scheduled to come off patent in the next four to five years, the FTC expects the payoffs to be bigger and more common.
Tuesday, January 30, 2007
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)


0 comments:
Post a Comment