So, here is the litany of sly tactics used by Janssen with the willing cooperation of KOLs like Nemeroff , Rapaport and Keller. Remember, these KOLs are paid directly or indirectly by Janssen for their association with the marketing campaign:
design a clinical trial in which unblinding is guaranteed and ignore this confound which favors the drug;
secure high profile product placement in a journal like NPP, with the cooperation of the editor;
make false claims of efficacy in a negative trial report; when challenged, lamely try to pass off this compound misrepresentation as an “error” for which nobody accepts responsibility;
take self-serving liberties with the results of statistical analyses so as to claim efficacy where none exists;
suppress inconvenient statistical analyses of toxicity; manipulate the apparent risk-benefit profile of the drug;
constructively plead nolo contendere to the charge of manipulating key data analyses;
focus on the statistical significance of psychometric outcome measures while ignoring clinimetric measures of usefulness like NNT;
bias the analysis of efficacy by using completer data;
bias the analysis of toxicity by using ITT data;
and ignore existing data that suggest the corporation’s drug is inferior to established alternatives.
Health Care Renewal
No comments:
Post a Comment