Thursday, October 28, 2010

Five GlaxoSmithKline executives who allegedly ignored Eckard believed to be still at company | Business | The Guardian

The court documents allege that Eckard, who had recommended the factory be shut until the issues were resolved, communicated the quality violations at the plant in Cidra to David Pulman, president of global manufacturing and supply; Janice Whitaker, senior vice president of global quality; Peter Savin, vice president of global quality assurance; Diane Sevigny, director of global quality assurance, risk management and compliance; and Jonathan Box, vice president of manufacturing and supply for North America.

All five executives are believed to be still working for the London-listed company, while Pulman is also a member of the company's 18-strong corporate executive team, which includes chief executive Andrew Witty.

The whistleblower's evidence states: "Eckard now believes that Whitaker, Pulman and other GSK executives were unwilling to acknowledge the gravity of the violations at the Cidra plant and to take the action that Eckard had recommended in part because the FDA had indicated that it would not consider approvals for [GSK drugs] Avandamet and Factive until [a previous FDA warning was] resolved."

It further outlines how "on or about April 2, 2003, Eckard delivered to GSK senior managers Box, Savin, Whitaker and Sevigny … a non-routine detailed memorandum on Current Compliance Risks for Manufacturing and Supply of Drug Products at Cidra … She did not receive any response to her memorandum from any of the managers."

Eckard also states that she told Sevigny "that she would not participate in a cover-up … and would not take part in any further meetings with the FDA about the Cidra plant … During this period and thereafter, Eckard and Sevigny were in frequent and increasing conflict about GSK's management of the quality and compliance problems at Cidra."

Posted via email from Jack's posterous

1 comment:

DanielHaszard said...

Glaxo whistle-blower gets $96 million.

The deal with Zyprexa is that Eli Lilly pleaded guilty to criminal wrongs (”viva Zyprexa” campaign) the Zyprexa saga was rotten through and through.
Eight Lilly EMPLOYEES got millions each as supposed informant ‘whistle blowers’.Lawyers on BOTH sides got millions and millions……most patient claimants who got sick are ‘mentally challenged’ and less able to advocate for themselves.
The Class action Lawsuits in the US had payouts of $85,000 BUT the lawyers got 45 percent and then the govt got most of the rest for having to take care of the victim/patients medical expenses.Soooo,,,,$85K turned into about $9,000 for Zyprexa claimants many had their food stamps and other state benefits taken away because of their *windfall profit* making them worse off in the end.
*
Daniel Haszard Zyprexa victim activist and patient who got diabetes from it.
http://www.zyprexa-victims.com