The UK Bribery Act introduces four offences (two of which are new to the statute books): making a bribe, accepting a bribe, bribing a foreign public official and — of particular interest to pharma — failing to prevent bribery at a corporate level. (This point, wrote Steve Gray on Pharmaphorum [September 20, 2010] “encompasses not just employees, but any agents carrying out an activity to win or retain business for a company.” Or, as his colleague Paul Tunnah puts it, “senior executives are being asked to take greater responsibility for what actually happens on the front-line of the business.”) The upshot is that pharma companies in the UK are suddenly faced with a transparency ‘double whammy’. So what — aside from the apparent arrival of a climate in which the UK pharma industry no longer appears to be trusted to trust itself — are the implications of this?
Looking beyond the spin of Big Pharma PR. But encouraging gossip. Come in and confide, you know you want to! “I’ll publish right or wrong. Fools are my theme, let satire be my song.” Email: jackfriday2011(at)hotmail.co.uk
Friday, June 24, 2011
New Transparency in UK Pharma: A Bitter Pill to Swallow?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment