Monday, August 01, 2011

Massachusetts Sues Johnson & Johnson Over Risperdal Marketing Practices - Bloomberg

Massachusetts’s attorney general sued Johnson & Johnson’s Ortho-McNeil-Janssen unit for improper marketing of the anti-psychotic drug Risperdal.

The company marketed the drug as a treatment for dementia in the elderly and a way to ease various ailments of younger people when those uses hadn’t been approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Attorney General Martha Coakley said today in a statement.

Johnson & Johnson’s promotion of Risperdal for dementia failed to disclose “an increased risk of death” associated with the drug, according to the statement. The FDA approved the medication primarily for treating schizophrenia and bipolar mood disorder, according to Coakley’s office.

“Janssen’s illegal marketing and sales tactics helped the company generate hundreds of millions of dollars in sales in the Commonwealth,” the complaint states.

Teresa Mueller, a spokeswoman for Johnson & Johnson (JNJ)’s Janssen unit, said the company will “vigorously defend” itself against the claims.

“We are committed to ethical business practices and have policies in place to insure that our products are only promoted for their FDA-approved indications,” she said today in a telephone interview.

The case is Massachusetts v. Ortho-McNeil-Janssen Pharmaceuticals Inc., 11-2811, Commonwealth of Massachusetts, Suffolk Superior Court (Boston).

Johnson & Johnson, based in New Brunswick, New Jersey, fell 38 cents to $64.41 at 4:15 p.m. in New York Stock Exchange composite trading. The shares have gained 4.1 percent this year.

To contact the reporter on this story: Don Jeffrey in New York at djeffrey1@bloomberg.net.

To contact the editor responsible for this story: Michael Hytha at mhytha@bloomberg.net

Want to save this for later? Add it to your Queue!

Posted via email from Jack's posterous

1 comment:

Daniel Haszard said...

Zyprexa,Risperdal as well as the other atypical antipsychotics, are being prescribed for children, even though this is an unapproved, off-label use. Eli Lilly has been charged in allegedly pushing the drug for children in more than one state.
A report by Dr. Cooper at Vanderbilt University states that 2.5 million children are now taking atypical antipsychotics. Over half are being given them for Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder. Perhaps it is statistics like these that caused the FDA to finally require warnings on the labels of the ADHD drugs.
The use of atypical antipsychotics for children should be banned.
--
Daniel Haszard