Tuesday, August 27, 2013

Institutional Corruption and Pharmaceutical Policy


The goals of pharmaceutical policy and medical practice are often undermined due to institutional corruption — that is, widespread or systemic practices, usually legal, that undermine an institution’s objectives or integrity. The pharmaceutical industry’s own purposes are often undermined. In addition, pharmaceutical industry funding of election campaigns and lobbying skews the legislative process that sets pharmaceutical policy. Moreover, certain practices have corrupted medical research, the production of medical knowledge, the practice of medicine, drug safety, and the Food and Drug Administration’s oversight of pharmaceutical marketing.

As a result, practitioners may think they are using reliable information to engage in sound medical practice while actually relying on misleading information and therefore prescribe drugs that are unnecessary or harmful to patients, or more costly than equivalent medications. At the same time, patients and the public may believe that patient advocacy organizations effectively represent their interests while these organizations actually neglect their interests.

To address these issues, a group of lab fellows from the Edmond J. Safra Center put together a symposium of 16 articles that investigate the corruption of pharmaceutical policy, each taking a different look at the sources of corruption, how it occurs and what is corrupted. The articles address five topics: (1) systemic problems, (2) medical research, (3) medical knowledge and practice, (4) marketing, and (5) patient advocacy organizations. They are now available online and will appear in the fall issue of The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics.

For a summary of each article and the key themes see, Marc Rodwin, Institutional Corruption and Pharmaceutical Policy.


Institutional Corruption and Pharmaceutical Policy
An Edmond J. Safra Center Symposium 
(forthcoming)
Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 
Vol. 14, No. 3 (2013)

1. SYSTEMIC PROBLEMS

2. MEDICAL RESEARCH

3. MEDICAL KNOWLEDGE AND PRACTICE

4. MARKETING

5. PATIENT ADVOCATES


http://www.ethics.harvard.edu/lab/featured/325-jlme-symposium

No comments: