Johnson & Johnson (JNJ) officials hid three studies showing some users of its Risperdal antipsychotic drug developed diabetes while claiming the medicine didn’t cause the disease, a witness testified.
As early as 1999, Johnson & Johnson’s Janssen unit had researchers’ findings that about half the patients taking Risperdal in a study comparing its risks to those of Eli Lilly & Co.’s Zyprexa antipsychotic drug developed diabetes after a year on the medication, Joseph Glenmullen, a psychiatrist and Harvard Medical School instructor, told a Texas jury today.
That study concluded Risperdal caused “medically serious weight gain” that led study subjects to develop diabetes, Glenmullen testified in the trial of the state of Texas’s lawsuit over Janssen’s marketing of the drug. At the same time, Janssen salespeople were telling doctors researchers concluded the drug didn’t cause the disease, Glenmullen added.
Texas contends New Brunswick, New Jersey-based J&J, the world’s largest health-care products company, defrauded the Medicaid program by promoting Risperdal for uses not approved by U.S. regulators, including for children with psychiatric disorders, and misled doctors and regulators about the drug’s risks.
The state joined a lawsuit filed by a whistle-blower, Allen Jones, a former Pennsylvania health-care fraud investigator. Lawyers for Texas Attorney General Greg Abbott are asking jurors in state court in Austin, Texas, to order J&J and Janssen to pay at least $579 million in damages over the companies’ Risperdal marketing practices.
Michael Clements, a Janssen spokesman, didn’t immediately return a call for comment today on Glenmullen’s testimony about the company’s handling of the studies.
Glenmullen, testifying as an expert for the state, told jurors Janssen officials didn’t turn over Study 113, which found Risperdal posed a higher diabetes risk than Zyprexa, to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration when regulators began probing links between anti-psychotic medications and the disease in 2000.
The drugmaker also didn’t turn over the results of two other later studies that found Risperdal and Zyprexa posed comparable diabetes risks to the FDA.
At the time, regulators were gathering information to decide whether to order all makers of anti-psychotic medicines to beef up warnings about the disease on their products’ labels, Glenmullen said. The FDA ordered stronger warnings in 2003.
Texas officials contend internal company records show that for more than a decade, Janssen salespeople falsely touted Risperdal as superior to rival drugs in sales calls with doctors because it didn’t have links to diabetes.
J&J officials contend they didn’t turn the studies over to regulators or publish them because they were flawed, Glenmullen said. He disputed that claim, describing Study 113 as “high quality” and a “superb” example of scientific research into drugs’ effectiveness.
The case is Texas v. Janssen LP, D-1GV-04-001288, District Court, Travis County, Texas (Austin).
To contact the reporters on this story: Jef Feeley in Wilmington, Delaware, at firstname.lastname@example.org; Margaret Cronin Fisk in Detroit at email@example.com; David Voreacos in Newark, New Jersey, at firstname.lastname@example.org
To contact the editor responsible for this story: Michael Hytha at email@example.com
Thursday, January 19, 2012
J&J Hid Risperdal Studies on Diabetes Risk From Regulators, Witness Says - Bloomberg